إشكالية حديث الجارية: دراسةٌ حديثيةٌ نقديةٌ

The Problematic Phenomenon of the Hadith al-Jariyah: A Critical Hadith Study

Authors

  • Mohd. Sobri bin Ellias Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33102/jmqs.v20i1.477

Keywords:

Hadith of the Slave Girl, Rational Evidence, Critical Study

Abstract

The noble Islamic religion is the religion that Allah has chosen for His servants and commanded us to follow. There is no real contradiction in its definitive texts. This research, in fact, stems from the doctrinal problem caused by the hadith al-jariyah (Hadith of the Slave Girl). In the Islamic creed, as affirmed by the early generations and later scholars, and agreed upon by the Islamic nation, it is established that Allah, the Exalted, does not resemble His creations. He is the Creator of space, time, the heavens, and the earth, and therefore, He does not need space, time, or anything from His creations. It is impossible for Him, Glorified and Exalted, to be contained or confined in the heavens or any other place. However, the apparent meaning of the hadith al-jariyah is misleading, suggesting a resemblance between Allah and His creation. It implies that Allah, the Exalted, is contained in a place, namely the heavens. This contradicts the clear verses of the Quran and authentic Hadith, as well as the consensus established in the works of scholars and the rational evidence that Allah does not need anything from His creations. In this study, the researcher employed three methodologies: the inductive approach, analytical methodology, and critical methodology. The inductive approach was used to explore the foundational heritage for information related to the topic from available books. The analytical methodology was employed to scrutinize the extracted information from its sources, aiming to understand its elements and intricacies in order to place it in its proper context. The critical methodology involved reviewing the extracted information from its sources to verify the accuracy of its elements and the soundness of its content, integrating them into the overall analysis. From this research, it is found that the hadith al-jariyah cannot be relied upon to prove the concept of place or any limitation for Allah, as it reveals the extent of disturbance and complexities within it, preventing its use as evidence in doctrinal matters.

References

Abu Dawud. Sulaiman b. al-Asy‘ath. 1998. Sunan Abi Dawud. Mesir: Dar al-Istiqamah

Ahmad b. Muhammad b. Hanbal. 1993. Musnad al-Imam Ahmad b. Muhammad b. Hanbal. Beirut. Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-‘Arabi.

Al-‘Asqalaniy. Ahmad b. Hajar. 1993. Fath al-Bari bi Syarh Sahih al-Bukhari. Beirut. Dar al-Fikr.

Al-Bayhaqi. Abu Bakr b. Ahmad. al-Asma’ wa al-Sifat. Beirut: Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-‘Arabiy.

Al-Bayhaqi. Abu Bakr b. Ahmad. Sunan al-Kubra. Beirut: Dar al-Ma‘rifah.

Al-Bukhari. Muhammad b. Ibrahim. Sahih al-Bukhari. Beirut: Dar Ihya’ al-Turath.

Al-Gummari. ‘Abd Allaah b. Muhammad. 2013. Al-Fawa’id al-Maqsudah fi Bayan al-Ahadith al-Syaadhdhah wa al-Mardudah. Beirut. Dar al-Imam al-Nawawi.

Al-Juwayni. ‘Abd al-Malik b. ‘Abd Allah. 1995. Kitab al-Irsyad ila Qawati‘ al-Adillah fi Usul al-I‘tiqad. Beirut. Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Al-Kawthari. Muhammad Zahid. Takmilah al-Rad ‘Ala al-Nuniyyah. Mesdir. Matba‘ah al-Sa‘adah.

Al-Khatib Al-Baghdadi. Ahmad b. ‘Ali. al-Faqih wa al-Mutafaqqih. Al-Su‘udiyyah. Dar Ibn al-Jawziy.

Al-Nasafi. ‘Umar b. Muhammad. 1998. Al-‘Aqidah al-Nasafiyyah. Beirut. Dar al-Masyari‘a.

Al-Qurtubi. Ahmad b. ‘Umar. Al-Mufhim li ma Asykala mi Talkhis Kitab Muslim. Beirut. Dar al-Kalim al-Tayyib.

Al-Qurtubi. Muhammad b. Ahmad. al-Tidhkar fi Afdal al-Adhkar. Damsyik. Maktabah Dar al-Bayan.

Al-Razi. Muhammad b. Umar. Al-Tafsir al-Kabir. Beirut. Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-‘Arabiy

Al-Razi. Muhammad b. Umar. Asas al-Taqdis fi ‘Ilm al-Kalam. Beirut. Mu’assasah al-Kutub al-Thaqafiyyah

Al-Sarakhsi. Muhammad b. Ahmad. al-Mabsut li Syams al-Din al-Sarakhsi. Beirut. Dar al-Ma‘rifah.

Al-Subkiy. ‘Àliy b. ‘Abd al-Kafi. 1356H. al-Sayf al-Saqil fi al-Rad ‘Ala Ibn Zafil. Mesir. Matba‘ah al-Sa‘adah.

Al-Suyuti. Jalal al-Din ‘Abd al-Rahman. 1405H. Qatf al-Azhar al-Mutanathirah. Beirut. Maktab Zuhayr al-Syawisy.

Al-Tahawi. Ahamd b. Salamah. 1417H. al-‘Aqidah al-Tahawiyyah. Beirut. Dar al-Masyari‘a.

Al-Zabidi. Muhammad Murtadha. 1393H. Taj al-‘Arus bi Syarh al-Qamus. Al-Kuwayt. Wizarat al-‘Ilam.

Al-Zabidi. Muhammad Murtadha. Ithaf al-Sadah al-Muttaqin bi Syarh Ihya’ Ulum al-Din. Beirut. Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-‘Arabiy.

Ibn Furak. Abu Bakr. Musykil al-Hadith wa Bayanuh. Beirut: ‘Alam al-Kutub

Ibn Manzur. Muhammad bin Mukarram. 1414H. Lisan al-Arab. Beirut: Dar al-Sadir.

Malik b. Anas. 1998. al-Muwatta’. Beirut. Mu’assasah al-Risalah.

Muslim. Muslim b. al-Hajjaj. 1992. Sahih Muslim. Beirut. Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Published

2024-06-01
CITATION
DOI: 10.33102/jmqs.v20i1.477
Published: 2024-06-01

How to Cite

Mohd. Sobri bin Ellias. (2024). إشكالية حديث الجارية: دراسةٌ حديثيةٌ نقديةٌ: The Problematic Phenomenon of the Hadith al-Jariyah: A Critical Hadith Study. Maʿālim Al-Qurʾān Wa Al-Sunnah, 20(1), 127-145. https://doi.org/10.33102/jmqs.v20i1.477