Recentring Womanhood: The Quranic Method as a Moral Corrective to Feminist Social Disruption

Authors

  • Azreen Zuhairi Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Tuanku Syed Sirajuddin
  • Nor Amni Bazilah Mohd Zain Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Tuanku Syed Sirajuddin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33102/jmqs.v22i1.610

Keywords:

Quranic Method, Womanhood, Fitrah, Feminism, Maqāṣid al-Quran, Social Harmony, Madani

Abstract

Contemporary feminist discourse has, in many contexts, shifted from its original pursuit of justice toward expressions of autonomy and resistance increasingly detached from transcendent moral foundations, contributing to social fragmentation, instability in family structures, and a crisis of moral identity. This study examines the Qur’an as a moral and spiritual corrective to such disruptions by advancing a faith-centred paradigm of womanhood rooted in divine guidance. The objective is to analyse how the Qur’anic method redefines empowerment beyond ideological contestation and restores balance, dignity, and ethical purpose. Methodologically, the study employs tafsīr mawdhūʿī (thematic exegesis) integrated with the maqāṣid al-Qur’an framework, focusing on Sūrah al-Taḥrīm (66:10–12) and Prophetic exemplars—Āsiyah, Maryam bint ʿImrān, Khadījah bint Khuwaylid, and Fāṭimah al-Zahrāʾ—who are recognised in hadith as among the women of Paradise. The findings demonstrate that the Qur’anic paradigm constructs empowerment through īmān, taqwā, and moral steadfastness, rather than through antagonistic or individualistic assertions. These exemplars illustrate a transformative model in which faith disciplines emotion, refines agency, and aligns human conduct with divine purpose. The study further reveals that the Qur’anic method reorients contemporary gender discourse from grievance to worship, from emotional volatility to ethical clarity, and from self-assertion to moral responsibility. In discussion, this paradigm is shown to offer a constructive socio-ethical framework that harmonises individual dignity with communal wellbeing, aligning with a Madani vision grounded in justice (ʿadl), compassion (raḥmah), and spiritual integrity. Ultimately, the Qur’anic method emerges not merely as a critique of feminist excesses, but as a comprehensive moral blueprint for restoring equilibrium and civilisational harmony in contemporary society.

References

Alcoff, L. (1988). Cultural Feminism versus Post-Structuralism: The Identity Crisis in Feminist Theory. Signs, 13(3), 405–436. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3174166

Anis, R. (2019). Asiyah, Maryam and Khadijah as Role Models for Contemporary Muslim Women. IIUM Journal of Human Sciences, Vol.1, 30–42.

Bajri, I. A. (2021). Qur’anic Manifestation of the Story of Maryam (PBUH): Unearthing Its Parallelistic Connection to Islamic Womanhood. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 09(08), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2021.98028

Bakhshizadeh, M. (2023). A Social Psychological Critique on Islamic Feminism. In Religions (Vol. 14, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14020202

Christoffersen, A., & Emejulu, A. (2023). “Diversity Within”: The Problems with “Intersectional” White Feminism in Practice. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 30(2), 630–653. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxac044

Connor-Savarda, B.-N. (2024). Toxic Feminism: When the Desire for Equality Creates Inequality. Emotional Intelligence Magazine. https://www.ei-magazine.com/post/toxic-feminism-when-the-desire-for-equality-creates-inequality

Husayni, F. S., Fouladi, H., & Bostan, H. (2025). Analysis of the Islamic Foundations of Women’s Empowerment in the Quran and Hadith: A Critical Examination of Competing Approaches. The Quran: Contemporary Studies, 4(12), 35–68. https://doi.org/https://qns.journals.miu.ac.ir/article_10625.html?lang=fa

Jaber, N. (2025). Beyond International Human Rights: Islamic Feminism as Alternative Rights Praxis. Feminist Legal Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-025-09577-0

Jaiyeoba, H. B., Ushama, T., & Amuda, Y. J. (2024). The Quran as a Source of Ethical and Moral Guidance in Contemporary Society. Al-Irsyad: Journal of Islamic and Contemporary Issues, 9(2), 1331–1345. https://doi.org/10.53840/alirsyad.v9i2.485

Lestari, P. A. (2024). Reclaiming Faith and Justice: A Narrative Review of Islamic Feminism No Title. Sinergi International Journal of Islamic Studies, 2(3), 176–189.

Lin, J., & Wang, Y. (2023). Back to Marx: reflections on the feminist crisis at the crossroads of neoliberalism and neoconservatism. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 954. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02341-2

Malik, R. (2024). Da’wah and Contemporary Muslim Women: A Historical Study of Sayyidah Khadijah. Jurnal Dakwah, 25, 64–90. https://doi.org/10.14421/jd.2024.25104

Mohammad, A. (2025). Islamic Feminism and Misconception about Women in the Muslim World. 3.

Ozkazanc-Pan, B., & Pullen, A. (2021). Reimagining value: A feminist commentary in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. Gender, Work, and Organization, 28(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12591

Swirsky, J., & Angelone, D. J. (2015). Equality, empowerment, and choice: What does feminism mean to contemporary women? Journal of Gender Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2015.1008429

Varghese, N., & Kumar, N. (2022). Feminism in advertising: Irony or revolution? A critical review of femvertising. Feminist Media Studies, 22(2), 441–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2020.1825510

Walker, V. (2025). How Modern Feminism Has Weakened the American Family. Liberty University. https://www.standingforfreedom.com/2025/03/11/how-modern-feminism-undermined-the-american-family/

Zhou, Y. (2023). Theorizing illiberal state feminism: Institutional dilemmas and political parallelism in China’s gender governance. Women’s Studies International Forum, 98, 102734. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2023.102734

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Azreen Zuhairi, & Nor Amni Bazilah Mohd Zain. (2026). Recentring Womanhood: The Quranic Method as a Moral Corrective to Feminist Social Disruption. Maʿālim Al-Qurʾān Wa Al-Sunnah, 22(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.33102/jmqs.v22i1.610